Behavioral Medicine Associates, Inc.
Education Pages
Quantitative EEG and Neurotherapy Fact Sheet
Quantitative EEG is the measurement, using digital technology, of
electrical
patterns at the surface of the scalp which primarily reflect cortical
electrical
activity or "brainwaves." Below is a normal adult male, eyes closed,
showing good alpha activity at P3/P4, O1/O2, the back of the head where
on should find alpha if the eyes are closed.

Brain waves occur at various frequencies, that is, some are
quick,
some quite slow. The classic names for these "EEG bands" are delta,
theta,
alpha and beta. The dominant wave pattern you see above is alpha; these
waves happen between 8 and 13 times per second, or 8-13 Hertz (Hz).
Alpha
represents a sort of "idle" state, or "ready but not doing much" state
and is normally fairly large over the back third of the brain when the
eyes are closed and when you are awake. Alpha disappears when we either
get mentally busy (e.g., open the eyes, start doing intense mental work
even eyes closed) or when we become drowsy. Thus the presence of alpha
can show the presence of an awake, resting state. If it is present at a
fairly high voltage when the eyes are open, this would usually indicate
an inattentive, daydreamy state. In fact we often see this sign in
adolescents
and adults with attentional difficulties.
When we get mentally busy and engaged, we should see alpha
"block,"
or reduce significantly in size. In its place we see mostly smaller,
quicker
"beta" waves. The beta family of waves happen at frequencies from 16-35
Hz, with higher frequencies known as "gamma".
Delta and theta waves are relatively slow. Delta is usually
defined
as waves occurring from 1-4 times per second (1-4 Hz). Theta occurs at
4-7 Hz. During drowsiness, first alpha disappears, then the size of
theta
waves begins to increase. As sleep begins, theta waves get quite large,
then become mixed with and eventually give way to slower delta waves.
The presence of delta and theta waves in the waking, eyes open
EEG
is normal, but only if the waves are fairly small. High amplitude slow
waves can be signs of various neurological and psychological problems,
ranging from epilepsy to ADHD.
For years all that was possible was recording these waves on
paper
with the traditional polygraph. Over the last 25 years, advances in
signal
processing made it possible to sample these waves many times per
second
(usually 128 or 256 samples per second; our current equipment samples
at 4096 per second) and to analyze them in various
ways. Using this technology we can now measure precisely the amplitude
and frequency of waves of interest, be fairly exact about the scalp
distribution
of the waves, and even compare a client's qEEG to a normative life-span
wide reference
database that shows how the person's brain activity compares, on the
average across a particular task, to healthy people of similar age and
same sex.
We use a 32
channel
EEG system, the Truscan 32 by Deymed Diagnostic,
which allows high quality digital recording as well as EEG biofeedback.
The digital
quantitative EEG (qEEG) shows the actual brain electrical events
associated with periods of inattention very clearly, for example the
under-aroused,
"sleepy" signals. The recording below shows big "theta" waves over the
front of the brain, indicating periodic "sleepiness" in these critical
executive systems.

The excess theta pattern is the most common pattern seen in
children with ADHD diagnoses. About 60% show this pattern. This
pattern is very responsive to the stimulant drug methylphenidate, since
it "wakes up" the frontal and prefrontal cortex enough so that it can
do the critical jobs of motivation, impulse control. Until the
medication wears off.
Many adolescents, some pre-adolescents and many adults with ADHD
diagnoses show too much alpha, with normal levels of theta. This is a
different type of brain. The excess alpha pattern does not commonly
respond to methylphenidate or amphetamine very well. The excess alpha
pattern represents vast processing regions that are "awake" but are
failing to "allocate" their resources to the job at hand. This causes
the experience of "I heard your voice but I have no idea what you just
said." The pattern looks like this:

This recording shows high amplitude alpha waves over most of the
back half of the head. Notice the first example, the excess theta waves
were over the front of the head (top four tracings plus the third one
from the bottom).
Some people, often with more severe difficulties, show a mixture
of alpha, theta and often delta waves. This next example is from an 11
year old girl previously diagnosed with Pervasive Devlopmental Disorder
NOS, a major failure to develop age-appropriate social and academic
skills:

Some of the big waves are alpha, the wider ones are theta and the
widest ones are delta. Contrast these patterns with the following
example of entirely normal activation during a task:

Notice all the waves are much smaller. There are some little
alpha waves, e.g. immediately above the word "normal", but they don't
go on for a long time and they are not big. This indicates "pretty
good" allocation of brain resources to the job.
You can see clear signs of over-excitement in some
people, correlating with high anxiety. The next recording shows
an anxious adult female with her eyes closed. Notice there is very
little alpha activity, but a whole lot of beta (the small, close
together waves). This person was also diagnosed with "ADHD", but
reacted very badly to a stimulant medication given by a physician who
was simply "going by the book" and diagnosing ADHD by the symptoms, or
complaints. Examining the QEEG would easily have suggested this person
is already very aroused, over-excited and that anxiety and distracting
thoughts were causing the inattention. Contrast this eyes closed
"resting" recording with the normal recording at the top of this
page.
WHAT ABOUT THE QUANTITATIVE PART, THE DATABASE?
First one must be able to read and understand the "raw data," the
recording themselves (as in the examples above). Then, we select areas
of the raw data that are free from "artifact" (eye movements, too much
muscle tension, etc.). Those chunks of data are analyzed statistically.
The size, frequency and coordination of the various waves are measured
by the software (Neuroguide, by Robert Thatcher, Ph.D.,
http://www.appliedneuroscience.com) and presented as numbers and as
statistical "brain maps."
Below is a statistical topographic map of the record above.
The small dots on each circle represent the recording electrodes. Each
separate circle represents the electrical power that was found at a
particular frequency, e.g., at 1 Hz, 2 Hz, 3 Hz, up to 30 Hz. Notice
the first row maps the 1-5 cycle per second (Hz) waves, the second row
maps 6-10 Hz waves, etc. Green means the size of the waves is
normal at the frequency of the
map. Red indicates 3 standard deviations above the mean power for the
person's age and sex. That is like being 7 feet tall. Very big. The
analysis proves that there is in fact a
large excess of electrical power in the "beta" range. That's what my
experienced eye told me from looking at the raw data, but it is nice to
have this confirmed and made more precise by comparison with age and
sex normals. This excessive beta activity over sensorimotor and
parietal "association" cortex reflects a
very busy brain that's working over time producing thoughts, images and
tension. This is commonly found in anxious people.
Settling
this down (training for lower beta amplitudes, coupled with increased
alpha activity) helps the person find a relaxed mental and physical
state.

Below is a topographic map of a teen with an excess of alpha activity
during listening. This alpha waxes and wanes, but on the average -
which is what the statistical maps show - there is a major excess of
it.

Thus we can see a physical reason for the inattention. We can also see
which regions of the brain are having the problems. This lets us "aim"
the neurofeedback training at these regions. This information also
tells us which task is the hardest for the particular person, so we can
have them do that task (e.g., listening) while doing neurofeedback.
We can
usually
predict which type of task is hardest or least fun for a child to do,
based on the
presence of slow, "sleepy" or "out - of - gear" brain waves. The child
and parents usually confirm that. We then know what type of task to
focus
on during EEG retraining. Some kids (and adults) have what I call "art
brains." They get very fine activation when they draw, although they
may be very inattentive during listening or other verbal/analytic
tasks. These kids I encourage to take "picture notes" in class instead
of just writing down words.
QEEG is not intended to be a "stand alone" diagnostic or as a
substitute
for other medical diagnostics. It is, however, a helpful adjunct which
can guide prognosis and intervention. qEEG is best used as an tool to
aid
in the clinical diagnosis of various dysfunctional states and not as a
substitute for clinical judgment and medical opinion. The qEEG should
be
combined with other medical, psychological and neuropsychological data
to best aid the patient.
The sister technology to qEEG is called EEG biofeedback,
neurofeedback
or neurotherapy. The qEEG provides the "targeting" information. That
is,
it tells us where and under what conditions (reading, listening, math,
etc.) the problem is worst. This analysis allows accurate electrode
placement
for feedback and suggests the tasks that should be used during therapy.
Neurotherapy is EEG feedback-assisted cognitive behavior modification.
It couples EEG feedback with the full range of traditional cognitive
behavior
therapy methods, including imaginal rehearsal, correction of
maladaptive
thought patterns, and rehearsal of new skills. We commonly utilize
intensely
activating, challenging tasks during the sessions to enhance brain
activation
and teach what it feels like to be focused and functional again. The
EEG
feedback signals the patient when their brain is in fact in a more
activated
state, indexed by decreased delta and theta brain wave amplitudes, and
increased beta and/or alpha amplitudes.
Neurotherapy is no panacea. Like any therapy it works best with
people who are motivated, who want to improve, who are experiencing
some significant suffering from their symptoms and who are not so
discouraged by years of trouble that they don't even want to try any
more. In this latter case, depression, helplessness and negative
attitudes toward the self - and often others - may have to be treated
before the underlying attention, organization or learning problems can
really be addressed.
THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS OF qEEG
TESTING and NEUROFEEDBACK: References
to Publications
The 1970's and 80's were decades of exploration and experimentation
with qEEG. The technology is no longer "experimental." It is used in
literally thousands of scientific studies to assess how people's brains
are functioning under various conditions of illness, stress and mental
difficulties. Patterns in the qEEG reflect emotional and cognitive
states and predict whether people will be able to attention, or even
what their mood is likely to be.
The 25 year-long research programs of Richard Davidson at the
University of Wisconsin, Madison, for example have shown an association
between under-excitement in the left front brain and/or over-excitement
in the right front brain to be associated with depression. The work of
Joel Lubar at the University of Tennessee, E. Roy John, Robert Chabot
at New York University's
Department of Psychiatry and many others have shown qEEG abnormalities
associated with
ADHD, learning disorders and a range of emotional problems. For
even more information go to PubMed (the
National Library of Medicine portal) and simply search "QEEG".
You'll pull up abstracts of hundreds of articles showing how QEEG is
sensitive to dementia, depression, ADHD, etc. For more specific
articles, enter the terms "QEEG ADHD."
Operant conditioning of EEG characteristics (what we now call
"neurofeedback" or "EEG biofeedback") is also well documented in
the scientific literature. Training easier access to the calm state of
"alpha" (10 Hz synchronized brain rhythms associated with relaxed
awareness, little active thinking, "just being there") has been used
for decades to promote learned relaxation. There are at least 18
studies showing neurofeedback can suppress epileptic seizures. With
some people, particularly those with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, we
may train for increased alpha and theta to access deeper states where
the unconscious mind can bring up personally important images and
feelings.
Alpha and theta is what anxious, stressed people have too little of
(too little access to) and what "ADD" kids often have too much of.
Training to decrease slow
activity and increase
fast desynchronized EEG activity has been used for over 25 years to
ameliorate
ADHD and epilepsy. More recently EEG operant conditioning has been
successfully
applied to patients with mild traumatic brain injury. Reports of
literally
hundreds of case studies have been presented at conferences of the
National
Head Injury Society as long ago as 1987. Many clinicians are reporting
case studies of depression being improved with the proper type of
neurofeedback training (calming down the right front brain, getting the
left front side more activated). The applications are many.
Unfortunately, there are those in the medical and pharmaceutical
industries that choose to ignore the existing research and the large
body of clinical experience that exists and claim there is no evidence
for the utility of QEEG or neurofeedback. You should look at some of
the actual literature
and judge for yourself. Or access some of it and
talk it over with a physician or psychologist you trust. It is
worth noting that the American Psychological Association has endorsed
qEEG
and neurotherapy as within the venue of psychologists with appropriate
training. Professionals with other healthcare licenses may also
be qualified to do qEEG and neurofeedback, but the potential client
should ask about the credentials and traing of anyone they are
considering working with.
What is the background of Dr. Nash
that qualifies him to use this technology?
Dr. Nash received his Bachelor of Science degree in
biology/biochemistry from Princeton University in 1968. He received a
Master’s degree for work at the Institute for Neurological Science at
the University of Pennsylvania. His Psychology Ph.D. is from the
University of California, Santa Barbara, where his dissertation
involved human EEG research on attention and perception. He received
National Institutes of Health-sponsored postdoctoral training in one of
the first four Behavioral Medicine training programs in the U.S., at
the New Jersey Medical School. He completed his postdoctoral internship
at the Clinical Psychology Department, Iowa Methodist Medical Center in
Des Moines. He has worked with psychological, emotional
and physical problems for over 25 years, using cognitive behavior
therapy and biofeedback.
Dr. Nash’s professional activities have included working in a large
multi-specialty medical practice in the Twin Cities, being Clinical
Director of a
Community Mental Health Center, evaluating human EEG and biofeedback
research for NASA and operating his own private practice in the Twin
Cities since 1987.
Dr. Nash helped found the International Society for Neuronal Regulation
in 1992 and was on the first neurofeedback certification boards the
NRNP and the ACN (now folded into the BCIA, see below) and was its
President in 2000. He is currently on the ISNR
Standards Committee which is commissioned to improve the regulation of
neurofeedback equipment and insure its proper use by trained and
licensed professionals. He has published on
neurotherapy and EEG in
peer reviewed journals. His is a Consulting Editor for the Journal
of
Neurotherapy. He also has extensive experience speaking and consulting
with management and professional groups.
Behavioral Medicine Associates, Inc. has many very satisfied
patients
who can testify that neurotherapy has reduced their symptoms of ADHD,
anxiety, depression and brain injury.
Memory has been improved, emotional instability has been decreased or
eliminated,
and executive function has been improved.
IF QEEG AND NEUROTHERAPY ARE SO GOOD, WHY AREN'T MORE CLINICIANS
USING
IT?
We estimate that perhaps 3500 clinicians are actively using
neurotherapy in the U.S. Most
psychologists and physicians simply have not been educated in the
clinical
applications of EEG biofeedback and have not read the existing research
and clinical literature, in spite of the fact that applications to
anxiety,
epilepsy and attentional deficits date back to the 1970's.
The instrumentation is expensive and requires serious study and
training
to use competently. Proper instrumentation has only recently become
generally
available. Two national organizations to promote and develop this
approach
have been formed in the last three years. Attendance at the ISNR national conference
has grown to 450 this year. More clinicians
are using neurotherapy each year. For psychologists and others who did
not have extensive graduate training in neurobiology in graduate
school, it takes some serious study and work, including
supervision, to become competent in neurotherapy. So the spread
is slow, but steady.
Certification in neurotherapy is advancing and, we believe,
necessary
so that insurers can choose to reimburse only certified clinicians. A
national biofeedback organization, the Biofeedback Certification
Institute of America, certifies health care practioners as competent to
perform a wide range of types of biofeedback. The BCIA was
established in 1981 to certify practitioners in peripheral (EMG,
temperature,
GSR) biofeedback techniques and now has certification in
EEG biofeedback (neurofeedback) available via
tests administered at the major annual conferences of the ISNR and AAPB.
Return
to BMA Homepage